African Regulators Advanced Hazardous Pesticide Phase-Out Plans

Officials in South Africa, Kenya, and Ghana are aligning pesticide management strategies to meet global safety targets.

Updated on Sept. 22, 2026 in Organic Food

Isometric editorial illustration of a single steel agricultural canister sitting on a solid plinth, representing hazardous chemical management policy.
Regulators from South Africa, Kenya, and Ghana have agreed to align pesticide management strategies, aiming to phase out hazardous chemicals by 2035. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should governments prioritize strict chemical regulations even if they might increase costs for local farmers?

On September 1, 2026, regulators from South Africa, Kenya, and Ghana met to discuss coordinated strategies for phasing out highly hazardous pesticides. This initiative aligns with international commitments to improve agricultural safety and chemical management by 2035.

Why it matters

Coordinated regulatory action helps countries balance the reduction of hazardous chemical exposure with the need to sustain vital farmer livelihoods. By sharing management frameworks, these nations aim to refine how they identify and restrict high-risk products.

Ghana identified 22 active ingredients meeting high-hazard criteria, while South Africa and Kenya continue to refine national lists and ingredient reviews. It remains unclear how quickly these findings will translate into finalized, across-the-board product bans.

The players

CropLife International

An international trade association representing the plant science industry and conducting pesticide portfolio reviews.

CropLife Africa Middle East

An organization supporting regional pesticide management frameworks across nations including Kenya, Morocco, and Egypt.

The details

Regulators utilize science-based assessments to categorize pesticide risk, allowing them to restrict certain chemicals to certified farmers or professional service providers. This approach manages safety by controlling product access and application methods, effectively mitigating human and environmental contact while the countries work toward a long-term phase-out of the most toxic substances.

Timeline

  1. 2016: CropLife International conducted a voluntary portfolio review of over 6,000 products.

  2. 2023: The Global Framework on Chemicals established a 2035 goal to phase out highly hazardous pesticides.

  3. September 1, 2026: Regulators from South Africa, Kenya, and Ghana met to discuss pesticide management strategies.

  4. November 2026: The first International Conference of the Global Framework on Chemicals is scheduled in Geneva.

  5. 2035: The target deadline to complete the phase-out of highly hazardous pesticides.

Health Landscape

This effort marks a collaborative shift toward regional alignment in agricultural chemical oversight, following the goals set by the Global Framework on Chemicals. The progress follows the 2023 establishment of international benchmarks for chemical safety and phase-out targets.

Consumers concerned about chemical residues should prioritize identifying produce grown under certified organic standards, which strictly limit the use of synthetic pesticides. If you have questions about specific regional standards for chemical usage, discuss them with a nutritionist or food safety specialist.

The takeaway

The move toward phasing out highly hazardous pesticides reflects a broader global commitment to reducing toxic chemical exposure in the food supply. You can track this progress by looking for updated labeling standards or agricultural safety certifications as these nations implement their new management frameworks.

What happens next

The International Conference of the Global Framework on Chemicals is scheduled for November 2026 in Geneva, where further progress on the 2035 phase-out goal will be addressed.

Further reading

For more information on food safety standards and chemical use, visit Organic Food.

Live Poll

Should governments prioritize strict chemical regulations even if they might increase costs for local farmers?